ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 April 2019, 07:24 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
42mm explorer 2 vs 15400 AP
Anyone that owns both that can make 2 wristshots on the same kind of angle ?
Any idea which of both wears larger? I own a explorer 42mm but i am interessed in the size of the 15400, the 216570 feels ''just right'' for me... Hoping for some pics of both watches |
23 April 2019, 08:04 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
Nover owned the EXII but both my Speedy Pro and PO are 42mm. If it’s size you looking for here they are in my 6.75” wrist.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
23 April 2019, 08:18 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
|
23 April 2019, 09:50 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
The 41mm AP RO does wear bigger due to the integrated lug design. I also tried on the EXII and it felt larger on my wrist than the 42mm omegas I own. Maybe it’s also the white dial that usually makes a watch wear larger than black dials? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
|
23 April 2019, 05:37 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
Quote:
Does it wear smaller on your wrist than the 15400 ??? |
|
23 April 2019, 10:15 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
Overall yes. It’s thicker than the 15400 which wraps and hugs the wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
|
23 April 2019, 10:33 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Darren
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 650
|
I used to have an Exp2 polar, and now have a 15400. So I don't have pictures side by side, but I have plenty of pictures/wristshots of both on my Instagram.
I have a 7" wrist, and like the fitment of both, although both are on the larger side. With the 15400 being thinner, and the integrated lugs that angle down, I don't think it wears bigger than the Exp2.
__________________
@dmb359 |
23 April 2019, 10:37 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
Quote:
|
|
24 April 2019, 12:52 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
|
Here you go.
|
24 April 2019, 12:56 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
dang thanx !!!!!! cool! as far as i can see, the AP is slightly, slightly bigger or the same. Thank you!! How big is the wrist there?
|
24 April 2019, 01:26 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
|
I have a really odd sized wrist. Where the watch sits is only 6.25 inches. Fairly small. However, I'm 6'1" and 170lbs with decent size arms. It's just that my forearm tapers down really small. I also have big hands, so larger watches don't really look that big.
|
24 April 2019, 01:32 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
|
Here is a 44mm Ernst Benz.
|
24 April 2019, 02:50 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
What’s critical with integrated lugs like the 15400 is having a flat wrist. The watch will wear better on a smaller but flatter wrist than it would on a larger but rounder wrist.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
24 April 2019, 03:17 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
I think my wrist is flat. How do i know if it is?
|
24 April 2019, 03:17 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
|
24 April 2019, 04:53 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,643
|
Quote:
That perfectly illustrates how the actual wrist size is only part of what matters. The hand / arm / body size all have a big impact on the perceived size of a timepiece on the wrist.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
|
24 April 2019, 05:01 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
24 April 2019, 06:54 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
Well typically when you look at the top of your wrist it should be wider than when you look at it sideways. I have a flat wrist on top so although my wrist is 6.75” I can wear larger size watches without the lugs protruding out. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
25 April 2019, 05:41 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.