The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 August 2019, 08:37 PM   #1
thehunter
"TRF" Member
 
thehunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 165
GMT 1675/16753 “Root-beer” - History Question

I’m having a healthy debate with a friend on the history of the 1675/16753 RB. My RB is stamped with case-back 1675, and I understand dates to 1974. However I believe that by 1974 Rolex was using model number 16753 so I’m thinking my date is wrong. Does anyone know when the ref number change happened? I understood that 1675 RBs with applied logos from that era were quite rare - can anyone confirm that?

Also - I have seen some vintage stainless/gold RB’s that look to be ref 1675/16753 with a solid brown bezel - was this bezel factory issued on that model?

First picture is my watch - second one I took from the internet to illustrate the bezel I’m talking about.

Thanks everyone!



thehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2019, 09:09 PM   #2
Chope Man
"TRF" Member
 
Chope Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jean-Michel
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Blue dial 16618
Posts: 293
I think solid brown was dedicated to the full gold model.

Besides, I really like yours! Probably the best two tone, in my opinion.
Chope Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2019, 09:17 PM   #3
thehunter
"TRF" Member
 
thehunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chope Man View Post
I think solid brown was dedicated to the full gold model.

Besides, I really like yours! Probably the best two tone, in my opinion.


Thanks!

I thought it was just on the gold version as well, but not 100% sure about that.
thehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 12:12 AM   #4
faimag
"TRF" Member
 
faimag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
The TT brown 1675 was offered only with the brown/gold insert.


The full brown was for the 1675/8 full YG.

My TT from 1977-1978


As for the transition from the 4-digit model 1675/3 to the 5-digit model 16753, it happened in 1980-1981.
faimag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 04:13 AM   #5
TimeLord2
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
TimeLord2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,191
From this article, not sure how well researched, it says the early versions were all brown until the bi-color was introduced (when? IDK…) https://www.fratellowatches.com/tbt-...753-root-beer/ Mine is all brown, and my Dad, who gave it to me, had never changed the insert. its a 3.248 mil serial, placing it somewhere around 1972.
Attached Images
 
TimeLord2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 12:49 PM   #6
thehunter
"TRF" Member
 
thehunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by faimag View Post
The TT brown 1675 was offered only with the brown/gold insert.


The full brown was for the 1675/8 full YG.

My TT from 1977-1978


As for the transition from the 4-digit model 1675/3 to the 5-digit model 16753, it happened in 1980-1981.


My case is 1675. There is no 3. Does yours say 16753?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
thehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 01:45 PM   #7
TimeLord2
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
TimeLord2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehunter View Post
My case is 1675. There is no 3. Does yours say 16753?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Same. Only 1675 between the lugs. For the TT in this model it's usually denoted by 1675/3, with the "3" indicating a TT version. That said, I don't think that was ever actually engraved on the case. However, the later model is a 16753, in the 16750 model range, a five digit version introduced somewhere around 1982 running thru 1989. Please correct me if i am wrong on that. Anybody? Bueller, Bueller, Bueller...?
TimeLord2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 02:29 AM   #8
thehunter
"TRF" Member
 
thehunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 165
That’s helpful, thanks!
thehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 08:51 AM   #9
Fleegle
"TRF" Member
 
Fleegle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: London
Posts: 92
I'm learning from this thread.
Mine pictured below, has a sunburst dial. The watches above all appear to have matt dials.
Is this date related?
Thanks in advance.



Fleegle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2019, 01:55 PM   #10
HORNBLOWER
"TRF" Member
 
HORNBLOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Ben
Location: Ireland
Watch: 1 OR 2
Posts: 2,640
Mine is a 1675

1675
Attached Images
 
HORNBLOWER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2020, 11:09 AM   #11
pmartin1675/3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 59
Hi Everyone!!

I have a 1973/4 gmt master root beer with matt dial (3'4XX,XXX serial number). The watch reference stamped in the case is 1675 and the original insert bezel was all brown until the service.

Some years ago (2017) I took my watch to the RSC in Mexico City for a full service. They told me Rolex gonna keep the original insert bezel and replace it with a two tone one (brown/gold). So, I kept mine and left the watch without insert bezel.

They told me Rolex does not produce brown inserts anymore, so I think the all brown´s are very rare and collectible.

Best regards from Mexico!!
Attached Images
     
pmartin1675/3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2020, 12:41 PM   #12
Khans14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 338
I can offer no information to answer your question. That said, I felt compelled to respond to your post to let you know that is one absolutely gorgeous watch you have there.
Khans14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2021, 02:31 PM   #13
TimeLord2
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
TimeLord2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,191
Going to give this thread a bump. There is not that much information regarding this color combination. I am always looking for more. When was the sunburst dial "Tiger's Eye" introduced? Come on WIS geeks—I challenge you! And, humbly appreciate your responses!
TimeLord2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2021, 07:42 PM   #14
faimag
"TRF" Member
 
faimag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehunter View Post
My case is 1675. There is no 3. Does yours say 16753?
Sorry for the delayed response. My case is stamped 1675 (4 digit); there is no 3. The 16753 is the subsequent model (5 digit TT).

faimag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 01:48 AM   #15
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeLord2 View Post
Going to give this thread a bump. There is not that much information regarding this color combination. I am always looking for more. When was the sunburst dial "Tiger's Eye" introduced? Come on WIS geeks—I challenge you! And, humbly appreciate your responses!
I give you the Italian collectors version: the real Tiger Eye should be this one because Rolex used a stone called Tiger Eye, a variety of quartz.
Name:  Screen Shot 2021-01-03 at 10.32.19 AM.jpg
Views: 482
Size:  73.2 KBName:  Screen Shot 2021-01-03 at 10.43.17 AM.jpg
Views: 477
Size:  58.3 KB

But somehow that name started to be used for the 16713 with a soleil dial and zaffire glass and then passed to the 16753 with plexy and also to the gold 1675/8 with brown dial.
Name:  Screen Shot 2021-01-03 at 10.43.20 AM.jpg
Views: 484
Size:  70.3 KB

The Root Beer nick is for the two colors on the insert that reminds the famous drink
Name:  Screen Shot 2021-01-02 at 4.33.42 PM.jpg
Views: 481
Size:  62.2 KB
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 01:52 AM   #16
motoikkyu
2024 Pledge Member
 
motoikkyu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: PRJ
Posts: 1,732
My understanding is that the five digit reference root beer has a substantially different movement from the 1675, so I don't know if a case-back from one would fit the other. This is substantiated by the order in which the hands are stacked, which lets you tell without looking at the case engraving whether four or five digit reference. These are things I learned on this Forum. Having said that, years ago I bought a matte nipple 1675 dial that had had it's feet amputated, rendering it worth $150 on eBay, cosmetically sound. That one is on my 16753 (yes, I kept the original nearby) because I like the look, but enjoy the convenience of the later model.
__________________
"Do you like Breitling?" "I don't know, really, I've never been Breitled"
motoikkyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 01:53 AM   #17
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
Here my Root Beer

Name:  IMG_1645.jpg
Views: 485
Size:  172.0 KB

And my Nipple Dial

Name:  IMG_5070.jpg
Views: 482
Size:  158.6 KB
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 02:02 AM   #18
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by motoikkyu View Post
My understanding is that the five digit reference root beer has a substantially different movement from the 1675, so I don't know if a case-back from one would fit the other. This is substantiated by the order in which the hands are stacked, which lets you tell without looking at the case engraving whether four or five digit reference. These are things I learned on this Forum. Having said that, years ago I bought a matte nipple 1675 dial that had had it's feet amputated, rendering it worth $150 on eBay, cosmetically sound. That one is on my 16753 (yes, I kept the original nearby) because I like the look, but enjoy the convenience of the later model.
Yes, different movement with the quick set feature and different position of the feet on the dial.
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 02:43 AM   #19
drockadam
"TRF" Member
 
drockadam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Pepsi.
Posts: 5,749
Root Beer GMTs are incredible. Not a big fan of the new ceramic version. An old 16753/16713/1675/3 on a jubilee is killer!
__________________
- Adam
Instagram: @GMTSUBTIME
drockadam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 02:46 AM   #20
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,297
The case-backs are interchangeable between 1675 and 16750/16753. In fact, the 16750 case-backs were sometimes used as service parts for 1675 watches. However, as mentioned above, the movement is totally different as is the order of the hand-stack. And the latter can be seen without opening the case.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 04:08 AM   #21
Rafabond
"TRF" Member
 
Rafabond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Watch: Rolex, Tudor, etc
Posts: 620
First of all, forgive my written English, I hope it is understood well.

As I am in love with my 1976 1675/3, I will do a little history of my model and the following reference.
From 1970 to 1980, the reference 1675/3 was marketed, 1675 was inscribed on the box, the 3 was of the denomination for the steel and gold models and the / 8 for those of all gold.
It came with the matte brown dial and nippel dial, with the gold crown applied.
It still didn't carry the quick date change, and in the early 70's they had the hacking function.
From 1975-76, the Oyster bracelet reference 78363 was introduced.
Starting in 1980 the reference changed to 16753 and so it appeared on the box.
The dial was sunray brown and the crown was engraved and not a piece of gold like the previous version.
There was a dial with a coca-cola color litmus, which had the gold crown applied, in this case it was a service dial.

Reference 16753 already carried the quick date change. This latest version, 16753, with brown sunburst dial and nippel dial was the one used by Clint Eastwood.

Here are some photographs of my watch, it is from 1976, 414xxxx and with 78363 series A oyster bracelet

my watch is all original from the period (1976) except for the bezel that is in service. In 2016 I took it to Rolex to do a maintenance service, I have kept the original bezel, it is quite discolored and I prefer to take the service one that is more faithful to when it was delivered in 1976, I bought it from the first owner of the watch and now I am the second owner.

the last picture with a leather strap which I think also fits very well.






Rafabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 04:33 AM   #22
Rafabond
"TRF" Member
 
Rafabond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Watch: Rolex, Tudor, etc
Posts: 620
an excerpt from the booklet of the time and the reference table for the bracelets



Rafabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 05:19 AM   #23
Rafabond
"TRF" Member
 
Rafabond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Watch: Rolex, Tudor, etc
Posts: 620
codes to know the year of the bracelets





Rafabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 08:58 AM   #24
Rafabond
"TRF" Member
 
Rafabond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Watch: Rolex, Tudor, etc
Posts: 620
1675, that's how they have to look until 1980.

Rafabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 10:49 AM   #25
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
i didn't realize The 7836 came out in 1967. I have never seen one before that early, or any info stating they were introduced during 1967. Can anyone else confirm this?
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 06:16 PM   #26
Rafabond
"TRF" Member
 
Rafabond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Watch: Rolex, Tudor, etc
Posts: 620
Rafabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 January 2021, 11:32 PM   #27
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,297
@Rafabond, that just looks like something from the internet, which is full of speculation and misinformation. Can you cite the source?
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2021, 01:54 AM   #28
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
@Rafabond, that just looks like something from the internet, which is full of speculation and misinformation. Can you cite the source?
I agree with Dan. I discussed this "1967 intro date" with several knowledgeable collectors that have been around for decades and they haven't heard of the "1967" introduction date for the 7836 Oyster. Most collectors that I discussed this with believe the introduction date was during or around 1970. The 7206 rivet bracelet was still available during 1967 and for a couple more years after that.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2021, 02:13 AM   #29
Rafabond
"TRF" Member
 
Rafabond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Watch: Rolex, Tudor, etc
Posts: 620
this is another web page

https://gmtmaster1675.com/the-bracelet/
Rafabond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 January 2021, 02:49 AM   #30
baumare
"TRF" Member
 
baumare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
The chart I use comes from another Forum and says 1968 to 1974, but then again not a direct info from Rolex catalogue, just a research from collectors

Name:  Screen Shot 2021-01-04 at 11.39.04 AM.jpg
Views: 392
Size:  101.4 KB
baumare is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.