The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 6 October 2021, 02:50 AM   #1
illition
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: singapore
Posts: 81
(1999) 16570 Polar & (1999) 16710 Coke, some observations & differences

Hi all,



I picked up a 1999 16570 Polar today, and now have on hand 2 "Swiss Only" 5 Digit references.

While observing the both of them side by side, I noticed some differences and thought it might be interesting to note some of the points down!





*To note, both watches have been authenticated by an Ex-Rolex technician and known to have all original parts. Other than that, i'm not entirely sure of their history.



1. Laser Etching: The Coke has laser etching on the sapphire crystal but the Polar does not. For the last 3 years owning this piece, I thought that the laser etching was standard but after noticing the Polar was missing the laser etching I did some light research and now find that this might actually be a replacement (authentic) crystal. Does anyone have any insights on this?



2. Polishing: The Coke is much more polished than the Polar. I only noticed this upon comparing them side to side. I think the most noticeable difference for me is the crown guard. On the Polar I can see a very distinct line that runs parallel to the crown (& the rolex signed on the crown).









3. Movements are about the same, and they both run well. Although my Coke is probably due for a service as it's winding is pretty rough. Other than that, if I wear it as an "auto" it runs perfect and has no issues keeping time or holding power reserve.



4. Wearability: They both fit the same although I am a little more cautious when wearing the coke. The bezel is painted aluminum insert and if scratched might be pretty costly or difficult to replace. The coke also stands out a little more and attracts more attention as compared to the Polar which pretty much flies under the radar always.



5. Lume: The lume plots on the Polar seem to be ever so slightly more yellow than on the Coke. The lume on this Polar also seems to be more "yellow" than I remember my old Polar had (although that was Tritium, so that is quite strange). I remember reading online in the past that tritium watches kept in the safe tended to turn more "yellow" and patina more than tritium watches that were constantly exposed to UV - wonder if it's the same for Luminova (which these two have). My Coke sees a lot of light & sunlight on a daily basis - but as far as I know, the Polar has been a safe queen at least for the last 7 months.





All in all, these are both 22 year old watches and are holding up well given their age, and i'm glad to own 2 "Swiss Only" 5 Digit references.
Attached Images
               
illition is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.