what's the deal with Tudor's

[Omarion07]

Originally Posted by douglasf13

Also, even though they had an exclusive contract with Aegler, Rolex's movements weren't even technically in-house until they bought Aegler about 20 years ago. I see the old Tudor as Wilsdorf's way of getting around their contract with Aegler.

Not true! Rolex movements were considered in-house since 1935, with the exception of chronograph movements which they outsourced (and then modified) from ETA and Zenith. See this thread


When did Rolex develop there first in-house calibre
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/top...ink_source=app