ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JJ Irani · 29 September 2005, 06:14 AM

Hi guys,

Another crazy post from downunder

Well, guys, like I've said before, the Exp-II (for some unknown reason) has always been advertised as a 40 mm Rolex; but in reality is only 39 mm.

Although the picture below is not a very accurate representation probably due to the effects of "parallax" with the camera, I have used the same ruler to measure my other Rollies which always came up as 40 mm.

In short, the Exp-II is definitely 39 mm only (NOT including the crown). I know, the pic below is not very perfect, but when looked at from the top at an angle of 90 degrees, the actual case diameter is 39 mm and NOT 40 mm as Rolex claim it to be!!

29 September 2005, 06:14 AM	#1
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	I want my bloody ONE mm!! Hi guys, Another crazy post from downunder Well, guys, like I've said before, the Exp-II (for some unknown reason) has always been advertised as a 40 mm Rolex; but in reality is only 39 mm. Although the picture below is not a very accurate representation probably due to the effects of "parallax" with the camera, I have used the same ruler to measure my other Rollies which always came up as 40 mm. In short, the Exp-II is definitely 39 mm only (NOT including the crown). I know, the pic below is not very perfect, but when looked at from the top at an angle of 90 degrees, the actual case diameter is 39 mm and NOT 40 mm as Rolex claim it to be!! __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)