ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

PacNW · 15 September 2007, 02:26 AM

Quick question for those in the know...I just had my ND Sub serviced at RSC Beverly Hills, and opted for a new dial as the lume was basically DOA. Did a comparison with my 2005 Exp II for brightness and it seems that the Exp is still brighter than the Sub. Could this be because of the white dial maybe being more reflective? Same charge time on both. Pretty weird-I thought the new dial on the sub would be stronger/brighter.
Thanks all for any input

15 September 2007, 02:26 AM	#1
PacNW Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Tim Location: Sequim, WA Watch: Rolex DayDate Posts: 305	Lume vs Lume Quick question for those in the know...I just had my ND Sub serviced at RSC Beverly Hills, and opted for a new dial as the lume was basically DOA. Did a comparison with my 2005 Exp II for brightness and it seems that the Exp is still brighter than the Sub. Could this be because of the white dial maybe being more reflective? Same charge time on both. Pretty weird-I thought the new dial on the sub would be stronger/brighter. Thanks all for any input

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)