ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

redshirt1957 · 3 November 2007, 02:54 AM

While talking with my wife last night I actually heard something other than (yak..blather..yak..white noise..yak..moan..complain) because she threw in the word Rolex while I was pretending to listen. J/K! She was talking about why she liked her midsize over her TT Date and how she would love to have a SUB/GMT/YM in a smaller size. I showed her a ladies YM and she pointed out that while the face size is smaller, the watch is just too thick and out of proportion...IHO. She also stated that she has a use for the moving bezel, but does not have a need for 300m. For her use, 100m would be just fine as she wll never dive. She wants to know why Rolex does not make a slimmer sport watch for women?

3 November 2007, 02:54 AM	#1
redshirt1957 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Bubba Location: Bitsyville! Watch: Blue YM today! Posts: 10,053	Rolex Selling Women Short? While talking with my wife last night I actually heard something other than (yak..blather..yak..white noise..yak..moan..complain) because she threw in the word Rolex while I was pretending to listen. J/K! She was talking about why she liked her midsize over her TT Date and how she would love to have a SUB/GMT/YM in a smaller size. I showed her a ladies YM and she pointed out that while the face size is smaller, the watch is just too thick and out of proportion...IHO. She also stated that she has a use for the moving bezel, but does not have a need for 300m. For her use, 100m would be just fine as she wll never dive. She wants to know why Rolex does not make a slimmer sport watch for women? Last edited by redshirt1957; 3 November 2007 at 02:55 AM.. Reason: Guess?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)