ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

swiss ghost · 25 November 2012, 09:31 PM

i prefer the 'older' 16610 case design. they should have just added the new bracelet. the new case looks too big and clumsy for the 40mm diameter.The case better suits a 42mm watch (see explorer 2 42). some say rolex had to make the bigger case for market 'trend'. i wanted to comment on that: what trend? like it or not 42mm - 46mm watches are here to stay. 40mm by rolex is beyond outdated. ridiculous really. ONLY rolex purists refer to a deepsea as a BIG watch. no one else does

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

25 November 2012, 09:31 PM	#14
swiss ghost Banned Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Canada Posts: 540	i prefer the 'older' 16610 case design. they should have just added the new bracelet. the new case looks too big and clumsy for the 40mm diameter.The case better suits a 42mm watch (see explorer 2 42). some say rolex had to make the bigger case for market 'trend'. i wanted to comment on that: what trend? like it or not 42mm - 46mm watches are here to stay. 40mm by rolex is beyond outdated. ridiculous really. ONLY rolex purists refer to a deepsea as a BIG watch. no one else does

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)