The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 4 April 2014, 08:10 AM   #1
Lionel Hutz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5
Bracelet sizing for small wrists: 14060M vs. 16610 vs. SubCs

Hi all,

I have been shopping for a Sub for a few weeks now. My wrists are on the smaller side, and I am trying to figure out the bracelet sizing issues that I have read about.

As I understand it, the 14060M bracelet cannot be made small enough for some people without knocking out one of the permanent endlinks. I'd rather not do this. Does the 16610 have the same issue with bracelet design? I like the look of the ND better, but it doesn't make sense if it won't fit properly. I can't find either a 14060M or a 16610 locally to see if I can get the bracelet to fit.

Finally, it sounds like the SubC bracelet fixed this issue by adding more removeable endlinks. Is that right? Any folks with SubCs and small wrists want to weigh in on fitment and appearance? I tried a SubC at an AD and wasn't sold on how the big lugs wear.
Lionel Hutz is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.