ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

docmarioce · 22 August 2016, 10:48 PM

I've had all the subs (except for the all gold sub and ND ceramic) and have flipped them for any reason. The itch is back to re-buy a sub and have been thinking about the pre-Ceramic Sub-date for its classic appearance (not a fan of the maxicase of the new subs). Although I went to an authorized dealer and saw/tried the SD 4000-C and I was impressed. Of-course the difference in price if considerable but I'd like to hear your impressions. If money wasn't an issue and you were a fan of the sub-SD line of Rolex watches. Would you consider a SD-4000 Ceramic. What are your thoughts?

22 August 2016, 10:48 PM	#1
docmarioce "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 476	SD 4000 C vs. Pre-ceramic Subdate. I've had all the subs (except for the all gold sub and ND ceramic) and have flipped them for any reason. The itch is back to re-buy a sub and have been thinking about the pre-Ceramic Sub-date for its classic appearance (not a fan of the maxicase of the new subs). Although I went to an authorized dealer and saw/tried the SD 4000-C and I was impressed. Of-course the difference in price if considerable but I'd like to hear your impressions. If money wasn't an issue and you were a fan of the sub-SD line of Rolex watches. Would you consider a SD-4000 Ceramic. What are your thoughts? __________________ ______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)