The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 27 February 2019, 08:31 AM   #1
GreatScott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: In a house
Posts: 845
is Tudor the same???

I recently read a thread that dissected the new 3235 movement versus 3135. One thing that caught my attention was that in order to get a 70 hour power reserve the mainspring could no longer be replaced by itself due to the barrel walls being a lot thinner. This will definitely prevent many independent watchmakers from getting parts and increase future service costs.

I was wondering if Tudor had to do the same thing to get a 70 hour power reserve. If not, that is another major plus for Tudor.

in fact, if someone could dissect and compare the in-house Tudor movement versus the 3235 and let us know the differences that would be appreciated.
GreatScott is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.