ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 October 2019, 12:08 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
A. We're already seeing value difference.
B. Personally, If I have the option for both watches, same price and you tell me one was produced for a year. The other more than a year and counting. I'm gonna go for the one that was produced for a shorter time period. Why? Simply to have something that's different, even though it's ever so slightly different. So is there value? Yeah of course. I think you're mad or have some other agenda if you continue to say other wise. Again, not saying it will be the next Paul Newman, but there's no denying these small nuances affect value. Kind of reminds me of the 16710 3186 movement. Senior members, "experts", even mods here repeatedly said there would never be a difference in value. The same way you can't tell the future to say something will become extremely valuable, it's ridiculous to say it can't. There's no crystal ball right? So don't pretend to know either way. All we have is current evidence and opinion. Currently the price is higher for the MK1. Currently my opinion is that i'd rather have the MK1, and I'm sure it is shared with many here. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.