ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gedanken · 6 March 2009, 01:21 AM

Without spoilers, I'd give it a 7.5 out of 10.

Dan Dreiberg, Eddie Blake and Hollis Mason were spot on, Laurie Juspeczyk was better than I originally feared.

Doc Manhattan looked great but sounded wrong. Rorschach looked pretty good but moved and sounded all wrong.

Adrian Veidt - WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!!! Snyder screwed the pooch there.

I'm on the fence about whether Alan Moore was right in not wanting to have anything to do with the movie. Overall, the spirit of the story was maintained except for one key scene right at the end. I'll talk about that part later to keep from dropping a spoiler.

6 March 2009, 01:21 AM	#1
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	Watchmen Without spoilers, I'd give it a 7.5 out of 10. Dan Dreiberg, Eddie Blake and Hollis Mason were spot on, Laurie Juspeczyk was better than I originally feared. Doc Manhattan looked great but sounded wrong. Rorschach looked pretty good but moved and sounded all wrong. Adrian Veidt - WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!!! Snyder screwed the pooch there. I'm on the fence about whether Alan Moore was right in not wanting to have anything to do with the movie. Overall, the spirit of the story was maintained except for one key scene right at the end. I'll talk about that part later to keep from dropping a spoiler. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)