The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 1 September 2005, 05:36 PM   #27
Gedanken
"TRF" Member
 
Gedanken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani
Probably, the only thing that puts people off buying OQs, is the high cost involvement each time the battery needs to be replaced.

We are looking at the cost of the battery as well as re-sealing and waterproofing the watch. Can add up to quite a bit.

JJ
I don't know if that's all there is to it, JJ. One other thing to consider is the movement of the second hand.

Even before quartz movements came about, Rolex already tried a "dead beat" (one beat per second) movement in 1954's Tru-Beat, and it was not popular with the Rolex buying crowd. I think the fact that cheap, deadbeat quartz movements (pun intended) behave in the same way was the final nail in the coffin.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.
Gedanken is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.