ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues | 1,059 | 69.67% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine | 62 | 4.08% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) | 399 | 26.25% | |
Voters: 1520. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10 June 2021, 08:04 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,918
|
First continuous amplitude, rate, and precision measurements.
Three different 3235 and 3285 calibers in DU position. Data sampling rate: every 30 s Duration: 24 hours (2880 data points, each curve) Amplitudes (after full winding): 3235 excellent 3285 not good 3285 not good Rates, Timekeeping: 3235 very good 3285 acceptable 3285 not acceptable Precision: 3235 excellent 3285 excellent 3285 very good All three 32xx movements are within Rolex precision specs of -2/+2 sec/day From full winding until 24 hours (test conditions) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 14 (0 members and 14 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.