ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 August 2021, 07:54 AM | #25 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
And of course the 7million serial is throwing me off, as that appears to be a 1981 build, more likely to be a 16013, and would jive with what we know of the watch's history. Of course what you outline is certainly a possibility. Although my dad is sure that the dial was not changed when he serviced it in 2000. And I'm assuming if a new movement was needed at that time they might have put in a 3135? There is a chance my grandpa got it serviced sometime in the 80s, sure, but that's very unlikely from what my dad remembers. He was the type to just put the watch away if it broke, as he didn't fully understand the value of a Rolex. Definitely not the type to pay to service a broken watch. But this is all conversation. I asked them to have a service tech take a look at it one more time. If they confirm 1601, I doubt they'd screw it up a 2nd (or actually 3rd?) time, so I just get the watch back and take it to an independent. I'm just curious more than anything at this point. And I'd still like RSC to service it if possible, though that seems unlikely. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.