ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RLROCK · 23 August 2021, 03:11 AM

I've been debating which of the two watches to get as an everyday watch.

I just sold my Omega Moon watch but don't miss it at all.

So the debate begins. Do I get the Omega Seamaster 300 (which reminds me of my 1988 Seamaster that developed that similar patina that the 300 has), or do I go for the Tudor Black Bay Chrono?

A friend of mine says to get the Omega since I have four Rolex watches and not one Omega in the stable anymore. He feels the Tudor is a "wanna be" Daytona.

I currently own the Hulk, a black GMT, a TT DJII, and a blue DJ 41, along with a Breitling Avenger, a Panerai Submersible 973 and a 392.

View Poll Results: Omega Seamaster 300 or Tudor Black Bay Chrono
Omega Seamaster 300	63	52.50%
Tudor Black Bay Chrono	57	47.50%
Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll

23 August 2021, 03:11 AM	#1
RLROCK "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Richard Location: New Jersey Watch: Depends on my mood Posts: 515	Tudor Black Bay Chrono or Omega Seamaster 300? I've been debating which of the two watches to get as an everyday watch. I just sold my Omega Moon watch but don't miss it at all. So the debate begins. Do I get the Omega Seamaster 300 (which reminds me of my 1988 Seamaster that developed that similar patina that the 300 has), or do I go for the Tudor Black Bay Chrono? A friend of mine says to get the Omega since I have four Rolex watches and not one Omega in the stable anymore. He feels the Tudor is a "wanna be" Daytona. I currently own the Hulk, a black GMT, a TT DJII, and a blue DJ 41, along with a Breitling Avenger, a Panerai Submersible 973 and a 392. Attached Images __________________ 116333, 116610LV, 116710LN, 126300, 126710BLNR, Omega Seamaster 300 Master Co-axial, Breitling Premier B01 Chronograph, Breitling Superocean 42, PAM 392, PAM 973 Submersible

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)