ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

RLROCK · 17 September 2021, 10:43 PM

My first Rolex was a preowned Yacht-Master 16622.

I liked it but didn't love it. The overall look of the bezel with the face being very similar to the bezel seemed dull, as if it was worn and lacking luster.

With the changes made to the 126622, the Yacht-Master has piqued my curiosity.

So my question is how does the new Yacht-Master portray itself when compared to its predecessor with respect to looks and finish. Do the visual upgrades of the bezel and face resolve the "worn and dated" look?

17 September 2021, 10:43 PM	#1
RLROCK "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Richard Location: New Jersey Watch: Depends on my mood Posts: 515	How does the Yacht-Master compare - old vs new? My first Rolex was a preowned Yacht-Master 16622. I liked it but didn't love it. The overall look of the bezel with the face being very similar to the bezel seemed dull, as if it was worn and lacking luster. With the changes made to the 126622, the Yacht-Master has piqued my curiosity. So my question is how does the new Yacht-Master portray itself when compared to its predecessor with respect to looks and finish. Do the visual upgrades of the bezel and face resolve the "worn and dated" look? __________________ 116333, 116610LV, 116710LN, 126300, 126710BLNR, Omega Seamaster 300 Master Co-axial, Breitling Premier B01 Chronograph, Breitling Superocean 42, PAM 392, PAM 973 Submersible

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)