|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
| Yes, no issues |
   
|
1,059 | 69.72% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
  
|
62 | 4.08% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
  
|
398 | 26.20% |
| Voters: 1519. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2 August 2022, 04:19 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,915
|
32xx movement problem poll and data thread
Your calculated average rate value for all 5 rest positions results in +1,7 s/d, which is way off from -3 s/d on your wrist. Strange!
I can only recommend what I already wrote in #2600 and #2636: I would ask the AD for a full set of 5-position timegrapher data after full caliber winding, only to keep it as a reference data set for later. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 14 (0 members and 14 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Threaded Mode