ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

PhilLynott · 15 September 2022, 12:51 AM

I swapped the Pano version for the 39.5. I just wanted to experience both and didn't need to own both I loved and still do love the Pano version and can always rebuy down the road and even try a different color (probably would go for two tone) but for now just wanted to give the little brother a GO.

Will take some time to really compare as I owned the Pano for awhile and wore it a lot but initial impressions:

- miss the Panodate it's just such a great complication. However the date window in 39.5 is just fine and I like better in person than pictures no date would be great though.

- the smaller size isn't necessarily better it's just different. I like that it's thinner especially but never felt the 43.2 was too big.

15 September 2022, 12:51 AM	#11
PhilLynott "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2019 Location: Illinois Watch: Breguet marine Posts: 783	I swapped the Pano version for the 39.5. I just wanted to experience both and didn't need to own both I loved and still do love the Pano version and can always rebuy down the road and even try a different color (probably would go for two tone) but for now just wanted to give the little brother a GO. Will take some time to really compare as I owned the Pano for awhile and wore it a lot but initial impressions: - miss the Panodate it's just such a great complication. However the date window in 39.5 is just fine and I like better in person than pictures no date would be great though. - the smaller size isn't necessarily better it's just different. I like that it's thinner especially but never felt the 43.2 was too big. __________________ Breguet 7037 Tradition, 5817 Marine Black, Blue, Silver Patek Philippe 5134P, 5205G-013 Omega NTTD Seamaster A. Lange & Sohne 109.025

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)