ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

hgb4529 · 20 February 2023, 11:31 PM

[QUOTE=donald83;12627278]The 15300 is around the same price as the 14790, and also at 39mm which is the "ideal" size. So why do people still go for 14790?

I've worn both the 15300, 15202, and 14790. The 15300 has a larger lug-to-lug size and is much thicker than the other two. It wears more like the 41mm RO to be honest. I imagine people would choose the 14790 because it is more of a classical RO fit.

20 February 2023, 11:31 PM	#24
hgb4529 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: New England Watch: RO, Nautilus, GMT Posts: 125	[QUOTE=donald83;12627278]The 15300 is around the same price as the 14790, and also at 39mm which is the "ideal" size. So why do people still go for 14790? I've worn both the 15300, 15202, and 14790. The 15300 has a larger lug-to-lug size and is much thicker than the other two. It wears more like the 41mm RO to be honest. I imagine people would choose the 14790 because it is more of a classical RO fit.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)