ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues | 1,059 | 69.72% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine | 62 | 4.08% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) | 398 | 26.20% | |
Voters: 1519. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12 April 2023, 12:11 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,795
|
Quote:
That makes zero sense from a production perspective. You don't dip in and out of a batch of components over that length of time when you are producing that many movements. Also, you can build an engine from the best forged steel moving parts. You can balance those moving parts to perfection. Use the best bearing material known to man and have it run on the perfect map. You starve it of oil, however, and it will self destruct the same as any other. It also doesn't explain those watches that come back from RSC and develop the same fault again.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 23 (0 members and 23 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.