ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

HarryTimes · 1 June 2023, 03:33 AM

I've just put my name down for the new Explorer 40 after trying the 36mm on briefly (short of time, at AD, should've taken photos) and at that time I felt it was small, but perhaps that is because I'm used to my Tudor GMT as seen below. Should I go 36mm and get used to it, I know it's a classic so I want to love it. My current smallest watch is a Hamilton field khaki 38mm so have never spent time with something a lot smaller on my wrist. Will the 40 be too big...

The other thing is I know I can get a 40 much quicker. Attached a couple pictures of my Tudor on wrist for reference, let me know what you think

Name: PXL_20230531_172528653.jpg
Views: 817
Size: 46.7 KB

Name: PXL_20230531_172617704.jpg
Views: 811
Size: 74.0 KB

Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

1 June 2023, 03:33 AM	#1
HarryTimes "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2023 Real Name: Harry Location: Bath Watch: BLACK BAY GMT S&G Posts: 12	Explorer 36 or 40? I've just put my name down for the new Explorer 40 after trying the 36mm on briefly (short of time, at AD, should've taken photos) and at that time I felt it was small, but perhaps that is because I'm used to my Tudor GMT as seen below. Should I go 36mm and get used to it, I know it's a classic so I want to love it. My current smallest watch is a Hamilton field khaki 38mm so have never spent time with something a lot smaller on my wrist. Will the 40 be too big... The other thing is I know I can get a 40 much quicker. Attached a couple pictures of my Tudor on wrist for reference, let me know what you think Sent from my Pixel 7 Pro using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)