|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
| Yes, no issues |
   
|
1,059 | 69.72% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
  
|
62 | 4.08% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
  
|
398 | 26.20% |
| Voters: 1519. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
28 July 2023, 05:42 AM
|
#11 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,543
|
I just point out that the Chinese Timegraphers (I have had two) are not terribly accurate. I now have a Swiss Witschi (note the subtle difference in spelling vs. Weishi) machine and the differences can be substantial, particularly re amplitude. The Swiss machine has a very precise crystal kept in an internal oven and is used by many watchmakers.
I imagine relative changes (eg loss of amplitude over time) are pretty good, just noting that the absolute values may not be. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 26 (0 members and 26 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Threaded Mode