ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues | 1,059 | 69.67% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine | 62 | 4.08% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) | 399 | 26.25% | |
Voters: 1520. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
21 June 2024, 07:52 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: LtCol R
Location: Mtns-NM-MT
Watch: 1680Red-551214060M
Posts: 274
|
Quote:
separate research path that I am engaged in on the Blancpain 1315 caliber compared to recent Rolex calibers. Keeping it VERY brief as this is/is not tangential to the 32xx caliber. BUT the 1315 caliber is known to retain a 100+-hour power reserve while delivering startling accuracy over time. It does invite a comparison of Rolex 3135 -32xx- and BP 1315 movements as to their respective qualities, an activity that I am currently engaged in. {Please excuse this insertion, in the interest of horological research.} SD |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.