ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Joshua74 · 13 May 2010, 07:42 PM

Hello,

Your last link doesn't look the same as mine, I've a small wrist too, and the clasp is well balanced on my wrist because my last link seems to be half link than your "stock" bracelet (without modifying).

I've a 16610LV, my bracelet is not the same than on 14060M or 16610 ?

Here is a picture (there are 4 permanents links (the first, near 6'o clock is not on the picture), and one "half link", attached to the clasp:

Thanks

13 May 2010, 07:42 PM	#31
Joshua74 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: France, Annecy Posts: 21	Hello, Your last link doesn't look the same as mine, I've a small wrist too, and the clasp is well balanced on my wrist because my last link seems to be half link than your "stock" bracelet (without modifying). I've a 16610LV, my bracelet is not the same than on 14060M or 16610 ? Here is a picture (there are 4 permanents links (the first, near 6'o clock is not on the picture), and one "half link", attached to the clasp: Thanks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)