ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 May 2010, 10:28 AM | #1 |
Removed
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tokyo
Watch: 16600K (lug holes)
Posts: 182
|
Rolex Owner Opinion Survey
I offer the following Rolex Owner Opinion Survey on the subject of customization.
Interested TRF members may either respond via open reply or PM. DISCLAIMER: None of the data gathered in this process will be used for any useful purpose, just killing time on TRF. I will tabulate and report the results of the survey (without TRF member user or real names) after the thread runs its course. Thank you in advance for your participation. Enjoy the survey! V/R, Michael Multiple Choice Answer Options (Choose only one) A: Strongly agree B: Somewhat agree C: No opinion D: Somewhat disagree E: Strongly disagree Answer Format Sample: 1.A2.B3.C4.D5.E6.A7.B8.C9.D10.E11.A12.B13.C14. Rolex Owner Opinion Survey on the subject of customization (14 questions) Note: The phrase, “non standard Rolex” refers to an authentic Rolex component installed on a Rolex model for which it was not designed or intended. (e.g., a red GMTII 24-hour hand on a GMTIIC) 1. I think Rolex owners should make NO changes to watch or bracelet of any kind other than scheduled maintenance or necessary repair. 2. I think the use of NATO or ZULU style nylon or fabric straps IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. 3. I think the installation of transparent case backs IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. 4. I think removal of the cyclops lens IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. 5. I think brushing out PCLs IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., TT or SS GMTIIC) 6. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex bezel IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a blue WG Sub bezel on a SS Sub) 7. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex dial IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a blue WG Sub dial on a SS Sub) 8. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex hand IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a red GMTII 24-hour hand on a GMTIIC) 9. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex bracelet IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a modified GMTIIC SL bracelet on a GMTII) 10. I think the installation of a non standard Rolex clasp IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a Daytona clasp on a YM) 11. I think the installation of a PVD/DLC “blacked out” or otherwise modified Rolex part IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., a customized black PVD Rolex Daytona crown and pushers kit) 12. I think the purchase of a complete PVD/DLC “blacked out” or otherwise fully modified Rolex watch and bracelet IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., Project X customized Rolex models) 13. I think the installation of an aftermarket or custom made NON Rolex part IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., Hadley-Roma look-a-like bracelets and clasps) 14. I think the application of additional precious metals or jewels to watch or bracelet IS an acceptable choice for Rolex owners. (e.g., gold plated and/or diamond encrusted hip-hop bling) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.