ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 September 2010, 12:25 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
|
Honest comfort opinions: Sub No Date vs. Sub Date on the wrist?
Hey folks,
I am not trying to create a new debate over these two watches. I have a small wrist and benefit from every gram of weight and smaller bracelets etc. I have been looking closely at my Sub LV and thinking about making a change for a no date Sub...however, I may be misguided if there is nominal difference between the two. I know the Sub No Date (aka 14060M or 5513) has the non-SEL bracelet and is a mm or two less thick...but does it make a big difference on your wrist? I don't have both to do a side-by-side comparison. I love my Sub LV but have also been really digging the way my 16700 GMT Master feels on my wrist with a new 93150 bracelet. If I could get the same feeling from a no date Sub, I'd probably switch the Sub LV in a hot moment. Any thoughts here? Thanks! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.