The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 7 September 2010, 12:25 PM   #1
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Honest comfort opinions: Sub No Date vs. Sub Date on the wrist?

Hey folks,

I am not trying to create a new debate over these two watches. I have a small wrist and benefit from every gram of weight and smaller bracelets etc. I have been looking closely at my Sub LV and thinking about making a change for a no date Sub...however, I may be misguided if there is nominal difference between the two. I know the Sub No Date (aka 14060M or 5513) has the non-SEL bracelet and is a mm or two less thick...but does it make a big difference on your wrist?

I don't have both to do a side-by-side comparison. I love my Sub LV but have also been really digging the way my 16700 GMT Master feels on my wrist with a new 93150 bracelet. If I could get the same feeling from a no date Sub, I'd probably switch the Sub LV in a hot moment.

Any thoughts here? Thanks!
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.