ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

clew84 · 28 August 2011, 11:04 PM

I've owned both - I own a Rolex SD now but used to own a PAM 024 and a 312. I liked the idea of the 312 but couldn't stand how wobbly the movement was. It was also loud. Yes, it's an in-house movement and that's something, but to me that's not a high quality movement that you can both feel and hear with every twist of your wrist.

I like the look and size of Panerai but have not been impressed by what's inside so far. Maybe I just haven't owned the right ones.

28 August 2011, 11:04 PM	#34
clew84 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Chris Location: Cincinnati Watch: me soar Posts: 930	I've owned both - I own a Rolex SD now but used to own a PAM 024 and a 312. I liked the idea of the 312 but couldn't stand how wobbly the movement was. It was also loud. Yes, it's an in-house movement and that's something, but to me that's not a high quality movement that you can both feel and hear with every twist of your wrist. I like the look and size of Panerai but have not been impressed by what's inside so far. Maybe I just haven't owned the right ones. __________________ Rolex Sea Dweller 16600 Omega SMP IWC 3227-01 Autodromo Prototipo

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)