ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 October 2011, 05:26 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Doug
Location: Detroit Area
Watch: out for yelow snow
Posts: 1,067
|
Quote:
"if you don't appreciate the thought and nuances" this is my point. What is so great about it. Or do I need to conduct a $1000+ experiment to find out, because it has to be seen to be believed? I just asked a question, nobody I know has a mac, so, no, I don't know jack about them. Oh, and I don't own a Sub., but I do own a Casio.I'm more of a GMT guy. Watches aren't the same. I only ever met one person with a "collection" of computers. He was quite strange.Also, if I sold my watches today, I would not lose a nickel. Computers are a throw away item, they cost more to fix than replace.
__________________
So it's not the steam that causes the failure, but it's water that you notice in the watch after a shower that could lead you to believe the steam damaged the seal, but it's just the unfortunate result of an unserviced mechanical beast. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.