ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 April 2012, 11:22 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Should Rolex hire Jonathan Ives?
I guess the topic about Rolex's design direction has been up before but I'm concerned enough to keep discussing it. I do understand that a brand and design needs to evolve but I am increasingly alarmed by the new models and make-overs that Rolex offers to the market.
It started with the maxi-cases on the GMTs which then continued on the Submariners, which makes the visual appearance boxy, dare I say a bit crude. The proportions went out the window on the Explorer redesign, both on the Explorer I and the latest Explorer II. The Deepsea Sea-Dweller is a monster achievement and a technical engineering masterpiece but perhaps a bit too much focus on monster with the steroid-injected case, ringlock system and NASCAR style text. Don't get me started on the new Sky-Dweller... I wonder what would happened if the design genius Jony Ives (from Apple) would get the opportunity to redesign a Rolex? A less is more approach while focusing on the essentials in the design language and history, keeping functionality as a center piece. I dream about a Rolex Submariner no-date with a matte dial (from the DSSD), maxi dial and hands, Rolex crown and brand name at the top of the dial; only "Submariner" on the bottom part - no unnecessary text. I can live with ceramic bezel but I envisioned it a bit less glossy and tighter turning mechanism so it doesn't move all the time. Naturally it would have the older style case but with the updated bracelet with glide-lock clasp. Lug holes! :-) How hard can that be to create? How much more bling, oversized and overdesign Rolex watches can the brand take? Rolex, please bring in Jony Ives! [Tuesday rant off] |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.