ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 May 2012, 05:12 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Franken
Posts: 437
|
Some excellent points on both sides. In the end it seems to me they priced it not to sell. Priced it to sell more of their own watches. A way to have used inventory for customers to look at while they upsell them ("for just a few hundred more") into one with better margins. I have no problem with profits at all. But there likely was not going to be any profit for anyone in this case. Just a free display model. That is not value for value. A key to any honest business transaction.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.