ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Rolex 14060M or Tudor 79090 (Blue) | |||
Rolex 14060M sub ND | 69 | 80.23% | |
Tudor 79090 (blue) | 17 | 19.77% | |
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
2 June 2012, 06:52 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
|
I voted for the Tudor. I owned a Tudor before I owned a Rolex, I felt like I might have under done myself so to speak as I thought I wanted a Sub. In the end I could not see in my mind where the extra value was, and I liked the fact that the Tudor was less common, I went with the Tudor and I absolutely love it, clearly on this forum there is no second class citizen status for a Tudor owner.
I think if you like the style then go for both, and start withe the Tudor as they are less common. or maybe go the no date and then get a Black bay. Either way you are going to get a great watch you will absolutely love. I feared i may want to trade up my Tudor one day to a Sub, now I don't feel that way at all, and when i did buy a Rolex it was a Datejust. Now i am interested in adding other brands PP, Breguet etc. If you plan to be a Rolex family only person then go with both, if you see yourself only ever owning one, I would go the Sub. But i understand the torment went through the same thing myself.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.