ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 March 2013, 05:47 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Lynn
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 452
|
If The Cyclops Was Optional, Would You Have It?
Just curious how others feel. If Rolex offered the cyclops as an option on their watches, would you op to own your watch without it?
Also, would an AD replace a cyclops sapphire crystal with a non cyclops sapphire crystal? Would Rolex consider it an unauthorized modification, thus voiding the warranty and refuse to service the watch in the future? If I were offered the cyclops as an option, I would not have it on any of my watches. I have a Sub no date and a Daytona, both of which do not have a date function and of course no cyclops. I much prefer the look and feel of their crystals over my cyclops-ed models. I have an Omega Seamaster and have no trouble reading the date without a cyclops. It seems to me that Rolex could just use a larger or bolder font and eliminate the cyclops. At this point, it's probably looked upon as traditional, and something that makes a Rolex a Rolex. Sorry if this an old topic, I searched but could not find this exact question asked. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.