		Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion
Bigger & Better

Thread Tools

Display Modes

28 June 2013, 09:01 AM

#12

RolexPete

"TRF" Member

Join Date: Dec 2009

Real Name: Peter

Location: Massachusetts

Watch: 214270 Mk2

Posts: 1,963

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack T

Wish I had a picture, but as I gaze at my diminutive SS DJ, with the elegant WG Roman numerals on the rhodium dial, I unequivocally disagree - I do not think the DJ2 is MUCH better than the original DJ ! After all, it doesn't even have it's own unique model name. And the DJ is, as the OP pointed out, the original

I agree. The DJII is just too big for what it is. Much prefer the classic DJ.

__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.