ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 January 2008, 12:00 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
Sub Date vs. Sub ND First Impressions
Off the top of my head, these are my impressions:
SEL bracelet is not as comfortable. It feels heavier, thicker, and rattles less. Wetsuit extension took me a few minutes to figure out. I set it about 10 hours ago, and it is still spot on. My 14060M would have been fast by a few seconds by now. You can't read the date unless you are right on top of it, at a 90 degree angle to the crystal. Lume seems better. The word ROLEX on the dial seems wider, perhaps to match up better with the OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE. The new box is better. Bezel lines up dead on with the minute marks. I like the chronometer print. I want to stay up and see when the date flips. That is all for now. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.