ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 November 2013, 11:58 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
|
Funny how there are regular posts about how non-important COSC is with Rolexes, but then when a Tudor doesn't carry the COSC certification there's all sort of agreement undergoing COSC makes Rolexes better for having it.
I like the definition of expected performance that a COSC cert brings to the owner. Now we all realize that meeting COSC is not particularly hard for a watch movement manufacturer to achieve in today's world, which is not the point. The point is the OP is dissatisfied at +15 sec/day and really has no direct manufacturer's claim that his watch is failing to meet. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.