Need opinions on potential "upgrade"

[Nick_sixx]

Hi guys,

Long time lurker, relatively limited poster.

I currently own and love an Explorer 214270. It has a lot going for it (absolute classic in terms of design, Bond association, "under the radar" appeal, historical significance etc), but lately I find myself lusting after an Explorer II 216570 Polar.

While not really in the same "classic" category as a Sub, DJ, or Explorer 1, I have no doubts that it will stick around long enough to be recognised as one of staples of the Rolex sports lineup.

My problem is that as a (very) junior member of the workforce, I can only afford one of the two, so simply buying the Explorer 2 is not an option unless I sell my current watch.

So far I have come up with the following pros and cons lists to try and help me make a decision

Explorer 1 Pros:

-Classic design - will never go out of style

-Brilliant dial layout

-Bond/Fleming/Everest history

-Extremely comfortable

-Not as easily recognisable as a Sub or TT DJ

-Versatile

-Very comfortable to wear



Explorer 1 Cons:

-Size is a little on the small size for me (6'0“, 220-235lb "athletic" guy with 7.25 or 7.5" wrists) - I love wearing this watch with long sleeves, but here in Queensland I only really wear long sleeves for 4 months out of the year, and I can't help but feel a little self-conscious about wearing a smaller watch with casual wear - my speedy pro feels much more comfortable with shorts and a t shirt etc.

- lack of date is proving to be an inconvenience

- weak lume

-easily scratched bezel

Explorer II Pros

- Date

- Stronger lume

-Better size for casual wear, while still remaining a respectable 42mm and not falling within the blingy Chronomat/Planet Ocean XL/DSSD category

-Usually travel overseas or interstate several times per year, meaning GMT function has proper use

-Also not as easily recognisable as Sub etc

-White dial offers diversity to my small collection

Explorer II Cons

-Not as suitable for formal/business wear

-Lack of historical significance

- WR could be better for such a "hefty" watch



I work in advertising, and literally nobody in my office is required to wear a suit, so the benefit of the "dressiness" of the explorer 1 is lost in that situation. 6 out of 7 days per week I am wearing either a polo, or OCBDS with rolled sleeves, and in these situations I prefer to wear my Speedy Pro. Seeing as the Explorer II is the same size, I can't help but feel I'd be much more comfortable wearing that instead.

Sorry for the rambling post, but I thought I would just share some of my musings and hope to gather some input on which watch you would prefer and why.



Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk