The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 24 June 2014, 11:23 PM   #1
toiletfinder.o
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 26
My first Rolex (a review): 16600A, No holes case, Sea Dweller

Hi everyone,

I've been browsing this forum for awhile, and have decided that my lurking days have come to an end.

I have known that I wanted a Rolex for awhile. My first watch that I have worn for over 5 years was a Tag Heuer Formula 1, Red Dial Chronograph. It was time for an upgrade, and I knew that I wanted to stick with the genre of 2nd-hand steel sports, because they represented an opportunity to purchase a Rolex more affordably, and they hold their value better than most other watches.

After watching numerous videos and educating myself about the subject, I decided to go with the Rolex Sea Dweller, no holes case, 16600A Z-series for a couple of reasons that make the Sea Dweller one of the most iconic watches of all time.
- First watch to ever implement the Helium Escape Valve on a dive watch.
- First Rolex sports watch WITH date and NO cyclops.
- First Rolex sports watch to have solid end links.
- Thicker 1MM sapphire crystal vs the Submariner.
- Thicker case vs the Submariner. I love the increased heaviness/heft on my wrist.
- The no-holes case was only made for 3 years, which makes the 16600A model significantly more rare. I think this should hold its value more in the upcoming years as the new ceramic models slowly start flooding the market. I think that this characteristic preserves the Sea Dweller's heritage, while providing a modern touch.
- Far too many people wear the classic Rolex Submariner, so if you're looking for something a bit more special/different, the Sea Dweller is for you.
- I didn't like the new ceramic bezel of the 116600, so I passed on it.

Cons:
- Scratches very easily.
- Watch loses roughly 1-2 seconds per day, during nighttime, when I'm not wearing it.
- The bracelet is vastly worse than the newer glidelink version.


Last edited by toiletfinder.o; 25 June 2014 at 12:51 AM.. Reason: Attached image
toiletfinder.o is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.