ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

A.Sharp · 25 November 2014, 06:24 AM

If you took away the MSRP, and took away the already faded hype and perceived exclusivity of the daytona, I'd say GMTIIC = Daytona. They both are equal contenders IMHO. The complication in the daytona seems like a bigger and better deal, but its no where near as practical as the functionality of a GMTIIC, at least for me. Oh, and having a date on your watch goes a long way. GMTIIC also has a lot more sex appeal than an explorer, in my opinion.

-2000th post to say that, so it's not in haste -

25 November 2014, 06:24 AM	#32
A.Sharp "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: New York City Posts: 2,062	If you took away the MSRP, and took away the already faded hype and perceived exclusivity of the daytona, I'd say GMTIIC = Daytona. They both are equal contenders IMHO. The complication in the daytona seems like a bigger and better deal, but its no where near as practical as the functionality of a GMTIIC, at least for me. Oh, and having a date on your watch goes a long way. GMTIIC also has a lot more sex appeal than an explorer, in my opinion. -2000th post to say that, so it's not in haste - __________________ A.Sharp "I can't listen to that much Wagner, ya know? I start to get the urge to conquer Poland."

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)