ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 November 2014, 05:42 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
|
Interesting.
I have the old red hand explorers- And the new versions. I think they are totally different watches. The red hand polar version is the definitive explorer 2- not counting the original orange hand- that's the benchmark. The better watch for expeditions is the new orange hand white dial. And that's the point: for expeditions. The dial is amazing for viewing in low light- better movement- better clasp. The black dial is better for all round daily use- it's a dressier watch. The red hand versions are gorgeous and will do the job they are designed for. But you can't read the time at 4am in the morning inside a tent. You can with the new version. So, if you want the best watch for use on an expedition- and that's what the explorer is meant to do! Get the new explorer 2. White . If you don't do expeditions- but love a GMT function and a robust watch get the black. If you love the vintage feel keep the one you have: because it is better proportioned and looks better on the wrist. Just my take on it. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.