ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 February 2015, 05:07 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,004
|
Right but this was 1995...as someone said considerations might have been different then as people didn't know about the future collectibility and need for originality...function was seemingly still important for a daily wearer.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.