ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 June 2015, 10:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Home
Posts: 1,438
|
Selfish thoughts on SS Daytona
I've long for a SS black Daytona for a couple of years and back then was hoping for a ceramic SS Daytona as many models such as the sub, GMT, and YMII were all making their way into the market with cerachrom.
Fast forward two years and as many of you know, two weeks ago I purchased the black 116520!!! Although I haven't had the time to write a review, I only have positive things to say about it. Mainly the curved case which wraps your whole wrist allowing perfect comfort. Also the size... I've been wanting a ceramic Daytona and mainly because it would make the watch wear larger. Now that I've got my "Grail" I have this selfish thought of hoping they will keep the SS Daytona as is without any improvements as I find it perfect now. I guess in a sense I'm hoping for it to be kept the way it is so that the "Rolex bug" won't bite again if they do release a ceramic version. I'm sure some of you may share the same views while others won't. Not meaning to offend anyone as this thread is just reflecting my own feelings towards a new ceramic Daytona. I guess we'll just have to wait and see what comes up in Basel 2016 and whether that bug will strike again?!
__________________
Royal Oak 15500ST Master Calendar METEORITE Q1552540 | Luminor GMT PAM 00335 Aquanaut 5167A-001 | Nautilus 5712/1A-001 Cosmograph DAYTONA 116520 | DEEPSEA 126660 | Explorer 214270 | GMT Master II BLRO 16710 | GMT Master II VTNR 126720 | Submariner LV 16610 | Sky-Dweller 326139 | Prince Oysterdate 90630 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.