Grand Seiko Opinions?

[tom2517]

Originally Posted by daveathall

No Tom, you are wrong on that point, I did know what you were comparing, I do know what an SBDB001 is, it was that I just disagree with your logic (and still do). When I mentioned the MM 300 it was in response and agreement to your previous post in the thread about it, that is all.

I still disagree with you but have decided to agree to disagree.

Originally Posted by daveathall View Post
Tom, the Seiko SDDB001 is a Marinemaster (£1500) and not a Grand Seiko (£5200)


This was what you posted before, I don't think you know that SBDB001 is, it sure is not 1500 pounds, and there's no SDDB001.

And in 2005 there's no GS diver, so you are saying at that time Seiko doesn't have a competitor against the Sub, which is not true. They had one, and it is called SBDB001, and MSRP was higher than the Sub.

You said GS diver and Sub are in the same price range so they are competitors, but when SBDB001 and Sub are in the same range, they are not? You use price as a factor when it suits your argument.

But whatever, old people are too stubborn to listen, and they never admit that they are wrong.