ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 November 2015, 07:06 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 233
|
Premium for a good case VS premium for a full set?
Thought I should ask this here to see what the rest would have a preference for.
Now we all acknowledge how hard it is to hunt for a vintage piece, and a chance to find an all round "perfect" watch for yourself, is extremely difficult. The nice patina has a bad case, the good case doesn't have perfect patina, full set does not have matching hands, etc. Now given these options, what would you be happier paying a premium for? 1) A full set, but a polished case, not a horrible condition - still a thick case, just one that has seen polish yet generally in relatively good condition given its age. 2) A pristine condition. Probably unpolished, or touched up possibly once, but a perfect watch, thick lugs, with everything original, flawless! - Watch only. I have come to realise that both options 1 and 2 are priced the same. In fact in a lot of cases option 2 is even pricer. I have seen full sets go far cheaper even with a nice case if the dial was not perfect (no matching hands, etc). What will you choose to pay a premium for? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.