ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

CyberPaol · 18 January 2016, 03:45 AM

Hi guys,

going around the forum looking for green Sub-c and BLNR GMT IIc comparisons (I'm pulling the trigger on one of them), it seems to me that GMT IIc lugs are a bit slimmer than those of the Sub-c.
I owned a 116710 in 2010 (superluminova, not chromalight) in parallel with a 116610LN, so I could compare the two cases - side by side - a lot of times.
I am aware that the case thick is different, but I am sure that lugs were exactly the same.
Is it possible that Rolex "secretly" changed the case of the GMT, with the introduction of the BLNR model (> 2011)?
Is there anybody that own both the time pieces (or Sub-c, BLNR and LN GMT IIc) and could post a side by side lugs picture?

18 January 2016, 03:45 AM	#1
CyberPaol "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Marco Location: Italy Watch: Rolex and Omega Posts: 267	comparison SUBc vs. GMT Iic lugs Hi guys, going around the forum looking for green Sub-c and BLNR GMT IIc comparisons (I'm pulling the trigger on one of them), it seems to me that GMT IIc lugs are a bit slimmer than those of the Sub-c. I owned a 116710 in 2010 (superluminova, not chromalight) in parallel with a 116610LN, so I could compare the two cases - side by side - a lot of times. I am aware that the case thick is different, but I am sure that lugs were exactly the same. Is it possible that Rolex "secretly" changed the case of the GMT, with the introduction of the BLNR model (> 2011)? Is there anybody that own both the time pieces (or Sub-c, BLNR and LN GMT IIc) and could post a side by side lugs picture? __________________ 14060M (no C.O.S.C.) * 16610LN RRR * 126610LN * 216610LV * 16710 Pepsi * 126710 BLRO * 116520 White Chromalight * 16570 Polar * 226570 Polar * 126334 Vivid Blue jubilee * Moonwatch 3861 hesalite

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)