ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 April 2016, 05:06 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: London
Posts: 148
|
Sub C vs 214270 comfort
Hi all,
Very specific question - I hope it's not too irrelevant. I recently sold my Sub C date - impulse purchase after falling in love with it, trying it on twice in an AD and deciding I wanted it. A year later my 6" wrists had taken enough. I had to take it off at my desk, it slid up and down and poked into my hand and generally annoyed the s*** out of my skinny wrists. I sold it... And lost a lot of money on it! Has anyone got an explorer 214270 and Sub C who can compare how comfortably they sit? I want a sporty, young watch to balance out my DJ and vintage IWC, but don't want to make the same mistake if the Exp1 feels the same. I see the lug-to-lug distances are only 1mm different but maybe the height helps? Also does anyone else have to take their watch off whilst working at a desk/keyboard? Or am I losing it? ;) Cheers in advance for the help, A very regretful ex-sub owner :( Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.