ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

docmarioce · 22 August 2016, 10:48 PM

I've had all the subs (except for the all gold sub and ND ceramic) and have flipped them for any reason. The itch is back to re-buy a sub and have been thinking about the pre-Ceramic Sub-date for its classic appearance (not a fan of the maxicase of the new subs). Although I went to an authorized dealer and saw/tried the SD 4000-C and I was impressed. Of-course the difference in price if considerable but I'd like to hear your impressions. If money wasn't an issue and you were a fan of the sub-SD line of Rolex watches. Would you consider a SD-4000 Ceramic. What are your thoughts?

22 August 2016, 10:48 PM	#1
docmarioce "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 476	SD 4000 C vs. Pre-ceramic Subdate. I've had all the subs (except for the all gold sub and ND ceramic) and have flipped them for any reason. The itch is back to re-buy a sub and have been thinking about the pre-Ceramic Sub-date for its classic appearance (not a fan of the maxicase of the new subs). Although I went to an authorized dealer and saw/tried the SD 4000-C and I was impressed. Of-course the difference in price if considerable but I'd like to hear your impressions. If money wasn't an issue and you were a fan of the sub-SD line of Rolex watches. Would you consider a SD-4000 Ceramic. What are your thoughts? __________________ ______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)