ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JasH · 4 December 2016, 06:55 AM

I've recently been thinking of buying a GMT or a Sub, and was curious why Subs seem to be more popular?

The most desirable Rolexes are often said to be the Daytona and Sub. Or am I simply mistaken?

The reasons I personally prefer the GMT to the sub are because:

- more useful complication
- 100m is enough for me, as I don't dive (or even swim with a watch)
- I like the black/blue of the BLNR, more than a plain black bezel (and I dislike the green in fact)
- marginally slimmer on wrist

In favour of the SUB:

- obvious choice for divers
- stronger in used resale value than the GMT?

What am I missing?

What are experienced collectors' thoughts please?

4 December 2016, 06:55 AM	#1
JasH 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: UK Posts: 309	Submariner v GMT I've recently been thinking of buying a GMT or a Sub, and was curious why Subs seem to be more popular? The most desirable Rolexes are often said to be the Daytona and Sub. Or am I simply mistaken? The reasons I personally prefer the GMT to the sub are because: - more useful complication - 100m is enough for me, as I don't dive (or even swim with a watch) - I like the black/blue of the BLNR, more than a plain black bezel (and I dislike the green in fact) - marginally slimmer on wrist In favour of the SUB: - obvious choice for divers - stronger in used resale value than the GMT? What am I missing? What are experienced collectors' thoughts please?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)