Defending the Rolex Brand & the Men Who Wear It

[Watch This]

Originally Posted by BristolCavendish

Wow. The witch hunt is finally on amongst those who obviously missed the point(s). Whether you found these accounts totally ludicrous (or even believable) is somewhat immaterial when compared to the actual the crux of the opening posts. Concerns regarding (1) the disposition of expensive timepieces in the event of a divorce; (2) clarification of water resistance testing; (3) the appropriateness of dressing a corpse in jewelry (or a watch); (4) the unnatural practice of extending a childhood nursing period; and (5) the contempt of various 'man-haters' towards successful male Rolex wearers are common curiosities/events and the follow-up posts provided by various forum members added both insights as well as constructive information to those interested in getting to the bottom of things. Perhaps the key here is the ability to differentiate between an obvious 'troll' post and a provocative one that raises questions of general interest.

Common sense dictates that if one suspects a trolling endeavor, it is often best not to respond at all. On the other hand, everyone is entitled to an opinion and thus, we have discussion forums of various kinds.

I'm all in with the concept of giving you more rope.